Command Performance (2009)
Writer: Steve Latshaw, Dolph Lundgren
Director: Dolph Lundgren
Starring: Dolph Lundgren
Synopsis
a "heavy metal" rocker in russia is trying to thwart a russian militant group's attampt to extort the russian government when they hold the russian president and his two russian pre-teen girls hostage at an american pop princess's concert...in russia.
MOster
Hah. Hah hah. Hah hah hah.
Based on the name in the info, I came into this one at like the 20 minute mark. After another five minutes or so I muted it and sought a later showing. This is a movie which was quite fun to laugh at but which you really don't have to watch on your own. I also have a feeling that our reviews will be quite similar here, in content if not in tone.
It kind of makes you feel sorry for Dolf. Again he's trying to channel the success of Stallone, and failing miserably. It's like he encapsulated every silly hostage movie he'd seen or read into an outline and let someone else fill in the details. We had a hard time deciding if he was supposed to be Bruce Willis or Steven Sagal. We were waiting for him to say some codeword or something and have the people on the outside recognize him either personally as a super agent or generally as a cop, but maybe to the story's credit he's actually supposed to be some dude who was just really good at bar fights in California. But that's not a lot of credit, because it's the only story element which steps above "rote."
Similarly with the direction, you can really hear the voices of other directors in his head as he sets up the scenes and lays out the pieces. In this scene the lights go out. In this one he disarms someone by grabbing the gun which is pointed at him. In this one people are creeping through an air duct. He tried to manufacture tension, but he failed as both a director and a writer. How do you expect people to be surprised by what happens in this movie? The production itself is probably the easiest to understand. This is exactly the amount of money that someone would put into a movie written by, directed by, and starring Dolf Lundgren; and these are exactly the caliber of supporting actors that could be afforded within that budget.
This movie is shit; but not, "You'd better come and take a look at this before I flush it," shit.
The Woman
this was a find on one of the movie channels where we just couldn't ignore the description. this was also a classic and obvious case of someone trying to regain their youth and former glory as a movie star and failing miserably. our dear dolph came off as creepy, old, and dated instead of the cool rocker. we kept having discussions in the midst of our viewing whether he was trying to be more like "die hard" or "under seige" so we came up with "under hard" for a working title. it also doesn't bode well for dolph being the writer. every girl under twenty kept telling him how hot he was.....ummmmmm...gross. he's a hard fifty something. age has not come gracefully to mr. lundgren. it looks like drago has begun to melt under the greenhouse effect. this was a laugh for a little while, but it got tiresome in it's desperateness. i yelled at moster for making us watch it and then doze through it. it was not cool in any way. unlike sly stallone's 'rambo" or the awesomeness that was "jcvd" i think dolph should watch those and take a couple of notes. intestinal confetti and burmese babies on pikes being thrown into structure fires is a plus, and being able to act might help as well. just sayin'.
analytics
Queue Total
Note: Real spoilers are in black text on a black background. Highlight the black areas to read the spoilers.
Queue Numbers
#200- Mysteries of Lisbon
Last- Once Upon a Time in Anatolia
Monday, February 7, 2011
Sunday, February 6, 2011
Bound for Glory
Bound for Glory (1976)
Written by Robert Getchby, Woody Guthrie
Directed by Hal Ashby
Starring David Carradine, Ronny Cox (a distant second), Randy Quaid (a DISTANT third)
Synopsis
A biopic of the early life of Woody Guthrie, from before the first time he ditches his wife until shortly after the second time he ditches his wife.
The Woman
booooring. i guess carradine did a good job sounding like woody guthrie, but eh. i could have done something more exciting for two and a half hours. he did good things. he did cruddy things. he rose up during the dust bowl and encouraged the migrant people to unionize. there. now you don't have to watch it. your welcome.
MOster
I put this on the queue. I have no idea why; and I guess that's one of the problems with the length of the queue. C'est la vie, I suppose.
This movie was extremely long. It covered some number of years of this guy's life, beginning as a sign painter in a small town in Texas (?)[ the woman says: "oklahoma!"] through some of his life in LA before he went back on the road. It was well over two hours long and you felt every minute of it, mostly because the dude's life really wasn't that interesting. It was directed well and acted well and--with the exception of some music cues which were supposed to inspire sympathy while dickish behavior was on the screen--produced well.
But either this guy was really pretty boring, or it wasn't written very well. The only thing I might want to hear about would be the inspiration of some of his hits; but outside of a misguided effort to unionize people (Seriously, if there's not enough work union workers go on furlough. What's the difference between that and the situation we see on screen?) we got almost none of that. He was a dick, but that's not particularly exciting in itself. He was selfish and immature and prideful while the movie wanted us to think he was peaceful and humanistic, but he was a creative genius or somesuch nonsense which did not make it to the screen.
Written by Robert Getchby, Woody Guthrie
Directed by Hal Ashby
Starring David Carradine, Ronny Cox (a distant second), Randy Quaid (a DISTANT third)
Synopsis
A biopic of the early life of Woody Guthrie, from before the first time he ditches his wife until shortly after the second time he ditches his wife.
The Woman
booooring. i guess carradine did a good job sounding like woody guthrie, but eh. i could have done something more exciting for two and a half hours. he did good things. he did cruddy things. he rose up during the dust bowl and encouraged the migrant people to unionize. there. now you don't have to watch it. your welcome.
MOster
I put this on the queue. I have no idea why; and I guess that's one of the problems with the length of the queue. C'est la vie, I suppose.
This movie was extremely long. It covered some number of years of this guy's life, beginning as a sign painter in a small town in Texas (?)[ the woman says: "oklahoma!"] through some of his life in LA before he went back on the road. It was well over two hours long and you felt every minute of it, mostly because the dude's life really wasn't that interesting. It was directed well and acted well and--with the exception of some music cues which were supposed to inspire sympathy while dickish behavior was on the screen--produced well.
But either this guy was really pretty boring, or it wasn't written very well. The only thing I might want to hear about would be the inspiration of some of his hits; but outside of a misguided effort to unionize people (Seriously, if there's not enough work union workers go on furlough. What's the difference between that and the situation we see on screen?) we got almost none of that. He was a dick, but that's not particularly exciting in itself. He was selfish and immature and prideful while the movie wanted us to think he was peaceful and humanistic, but he was a creative genius or somesuch nonsense which did not make it to the screen.
Saturday, February 5, 2011
Adam
Adam (2009)
Writer: Max Mayer
Director: Max Mayer
Starring: Hugh Dancy, Rose Byrne, and Peter "eyebrows" Gallagher
Synopsis
a lonely guy with aspergers syndrome and the new chick from upstairs start a relationship.
The Woman
i'm gross and girly sometimes. i liked this movie. it wasn't great or anything. it was kind of reminiscent of a lifetime movie, but i fell for it. who can't like the slow, but sweet guy from downstairs? eww. maybe it's hormones or something. the guy with aspergers played it unoffensively. he was pretty low functioning though. how this chick didn't know something was up before he told her...well maybe she's secretly a little slow herself. i must admit i started the day by watching that classic 80's teen romance/drama "lucas" i don't know why i always watch that when it's on either. i mean he doesn't even score a touchdown or anything, he's just the weird kid who got pummeled during the football game. i thought to myself at the end it must be the combination of the slow clap AND the freeze-frame ending that makes it so endearing to my soul. it must have put me in the mood to watch the outsider drama romance. like hitting a jar lid with a knife so you can open the damn thing.
Writer: Max Mayer
Director: Max Mayer
Synopsis
a lonely guy with aspergers syndrome and the new chick from upstairs start a relationship.
The Woman
i'm gross and girly sometimes. i liked this movie. it wasn't great or anything. it was kind of reminiscent of a lifetime movie, but i fell for it. who can't like the slow, but sweet guy from downstairs? eww. maybe it's hormones or something. the guy with aspergers played it unoffensively. he was pretty low functioning though. how this chick didn't know something was up before he told her...well maybe she's secretly a little slow herself. i must admit i started the day by watching that classic 80's teen romance/drama "lucas" i don't know why i always watch that when it's on either. i mean he doesn't even score a touchdown or anything, he's just the weird kid who got pummeled during the football game. i thought to myself at the end it must be the combination of the slow clap AND the freeze-frame ending that makes it so endearing to my soul. it must have put me in the mood to watch the outsider drama romance. like hitting a jar lid with a knife so you can open the damn thing.
Friday, February 4, 2011
Zardoz
Zardoz (1974)
Writer: John Boorman
Director: John Boorman
Starring: a red loin clothed, side burned, moustached, bad ass known as sean connery, boobies the way only a movie from 1974 can do them
Synopsis
an enforcer barbarian sneaks into the floating idol head of his fake god zardoz. he ends up in a "utopia" where the people live forever and yet there is no reason to live. he shakes things up with his super cool stache and loincloth and his acceptance of necessary violence.
MOster
Yeah, alright. When you hear a title like Zardoz you think you're going to get a floating head and Sean Connery in a loincloth. But you don't think you're going to actually be thinking about the plot afterwards. This is another film where suspension of disbelief is critical to enjoyment, but it's set in a future which is largely devoid of real science and that makes it much easier to swallow.
To an extent, this is a typical Eloi/Morlock story, but the film does a great job of showing how each race has its fair share of the supposedly-inherent traits of the other. There are complacents and malcontents on both sides, and the infusion of Connery's character--does he even have a name?--into the utopian society is just what's needed to get things churning. Thinking through that churn elevates the giggling to heights of real accomplishment.
If this movie were made in any other era it might have been more focused on the cerebral stuff, and that would be a shame. Now fucking Billy Joel is in my head. Fuck you, Jevon.
The Woman
i put this on the queue because frank decaro posted a still of sean connery from this movie and it immediately spoke to me. much like the faux god, zardoz. i must say it started as a joke, and it is awesome, but it actually has a solid quality concept in there. if you haven't seen it i would recommend. you will laugh too. just seeing the red loin cloth with the pirate thigh boot ensemble and the matching red bandoleers....priceless. but like i said there is also that hefty and significant substance underneath. there is a valid message in this and yet it is still highly entertaining because of it's dated appearance.
Writer: John Boorman
Director: John Boorman
Starring: a red loin clothed, side burned, moustached, bad ass known as sean connery, boobies the way only a movie from 1974 can do them
Synopsis
an enforcer barbarian sneaks into the floating idol head of his fake god zardoz. he ends up in a "utopia" where the people live forever and yet there is no reason to live. he shakes things up with his super cool stache and loincloth and his acceptance of necessary violence.
MOster
Yeah, alright. When you hear a title like Zardoz you think you're going to get a floating head and Sean Connery in a loincloth. But you don't think you're going to actually be thinking about the plot afterwards. This is another film where suspension of disbelief is critical to enjoyment, but it's set in a future which is largely devoid of real science and that makes it much easier to swallow.
To an extent, this is a typical Eloi/Morlock story, but the film does a great job of showing how each race has its fair share of the supposedly-inherent traits of the other. There are complacents and malcontents on both sides, and the infusion of Connery's character--does he even have a name?--into the utopian society is just what's needed to get things churning. Thinking through that churn elevates the giggling to heights of real accomplishment.
If this movie were made in any other era it might have been more focused on the cerebral stuff, and that would be a shame. Now fucking Billy Joel is in my head. Fuck you, Jevon.
The Woman
i put this on the queue because frank decaro posted a still of sean connery from this movie and it immediately spoke to me. much like the faux god, zardoz. i must say it started as a joke, and it is awesome, but it actually has a solid quality concept in there. if you haven't seen it i would recommend. you will laugh too. just seeing the red loin cloth with the pirate thigh boot ensemble and the matching red bandoleers....priceless. but like i said there is also that hefty and significant substance underneath. there is a valid message in this and yet it is still highly entertaining because of it's dated appearance.
Mega Python vs. Gataroid
Mega Python vs. Gatoroid (2011)
Writer: Naomi L. Selfman
Director: Mary Lambert
Starring: Debbie Gibson, Tiffany, Tiffany's Cleavage
Synopsis
An idiotic animal activist releases experimental pythons into the wild. These pythons attack the wildlife (specifically alligators) and grow to mega size, thus upsetting the local ecosystem. An idiotic park ranger feeds experimental steroids to the alligators, creating gatoroids to battle the mega pythons. Off camera (and possibly independently from each other) these two women sing duets. Spoiler alert: both characters die in ways which would be difficult even for a soap operauter to undo.
The Woman
i tried not to pay attention to this nonsense, but i couldn't. by the end i was cheering and laughing along. this is totally a movie that knows exactly what it is. it walked that line and fell on the right side. i know syfy has had it's fair share of great original movies, but, dare i say it, this was the cream of the crop. i thought the hype surrounding it was a harbinger of doom because that's usually how that works. i stand corrected. good carrer movie ms. gibson, ms. tiffany. the ending was a bold move as well. i did not see it coming. plus! bonus original music tracks.
MOster
This movie was thoroughly entertaining. It hit exactly the note which Snakes on a Plane missed so egregiously. It was blissfully self-aware. It was excellent in its simplicity; and you could drive a tank over the suspension bridge of disbelief. While I'm not entirely clear if gatoroidic consumption led to further pythonic megification there is no doubt in my mind that the amount of dynamite employed would commit zero genocides rather than two.
I must mention (yet again, I suppose) how Ms. Tiffany's breasts deserve third billing. Is this a covert episode of Project Runway? Who makes a ranger's uniform to look like that? I am not exaggerating when I say that one scene featured over ten cuts between a shot where front cleavage was immediately over the shoulder of the speaker and a shot where side boobage was in the center of the frame.
Writer: Naomi L. Selfman
Director: Mary Lambert
Starring: Debbie Gibson, Tiffany, Tiffany's Cleavage
Synopsis
An idiotic animal activist releases experimental pythons into the wild. These pythons attack the wildlife (specifically alligators) and grow to mega size, thus upsetting the local ecosystem. An idiotic park ranger feeds experimental steroids to the alligators, creating gatoroids to battle the mega pythons. Off camera (and possibly independently from each other) these two women sing duets. Spoiler alert: both characters die in ways which would be difficult even for a soap operauter to undo.
The Woman
i tried not to pay attention to this nonsense, but i couldn't. by the end i was cheering and laughing along. this is totally a movie that knows exactly what it is. it walked that line and fell on the right side. i know syfy has had it's fair share of great original movies, but, dare i say it, this was the cream of the crop. i thought the hype surrounding it was a harbinger of doom because that's usually how that works. i stand corrected. good carrer movie ms. gibson, ms. tiffany. the ending was a bold move as well. i did not see it coming. plus! bonus original music tracks.
MOster
This movie was thoroughly entertaining. It hit exactly the note which Snakes on a Plane missed so egregiously. It was blissfully self-aware. It was excellent in its simplicity; and you could drive a tank over the suspension bridge of disbelief. While I'm not entirely clear if gatoroidic consumption led to further pythonic megification there is no doubt in my mind that the amount of dynamite employed would commit zero genocides rather than two.
I must mention (yet again, I suppose) how Ms. Tiffany's breasts deserve third billing. Is this a covert episode of Project Runway? Who makes a ranger's uniform to look like that? I am not exaggerating when I say that one scene featured over ten cuts between a shot where front cleavage was immediately over the shoulder of the speaker and a shot where side boobage was in the center of the frame.
Clash of the Titans
Clash of the Titans (2010)
"Writer": Travis Beecham, Phil Hay, Matt Manfredi (screenplay), Beverley Cross (1981 screenplay)
Director: Louis Leterrier
Starring: a bunch of muscles and liam neeson and that hardcore dude who played one-eye in "valhalla rising"
Synopsis
man has decided to rebel against their creator zeus. the gods are pissed off. "release the kraken"
The Woman
sometimes i think i'm too critical of the things we watch and i should lower my expectations a little and just enjoy. even if i did that it would not make a difference when it came to watching this. why does the machine feel the need to redo movies? there was nothing to this movie at all. it moved too fast (dare i say) and didn't make much sense motive wise, and was too and then they did this, and then they did this, and then "release the kraken". ralph fiennes was just playing voldemort with hair and a nose. terrible. there was obviously too much penis involved with the reinvisioning because there was no focus on character at all. there was lots of focus on gigantic scorpions and weird bark skinned people and cg effects. the only thing that would surprise me about this "film" is if there was no sequel coming..... yep. i just looked things up and prepare yourselves for a clash of the titans trilogy. the first one wasn't enough of a disintegrating turd in the rain, we need more giant scorpions! we demand more god on demi-god action!!!!! why does everything have to be a trilogy. i want four! give me a quatorze-ology. (that was a bono joke if you aren't hip enough) yes. no. i desire more than macaroni pictures! i desire 14 clash of the titans in 3d! where the only thing differentiating them from a straight to dvd release is the massive amount of money spent on effects. with free taco bell to anyone who pays for a ticket. yessss. the smell of taco bell and 3d grecians. nothing sounds better to me. release the diarrhea!
Director: Louis Leterrier
Starring: a bunch of muscles and liam neeson and that hardcore dude who played one-eye in "valhalla rising"
Synopsis
man has decided to rebel against their creator zeus. the gods are pissed off. "release the kraken"
The Woman
sometimes i think i'm too critical of the things we watch and i should lower my expectations a little and just enjoy. even if i did that it would not make a difference when it came to watching this. why does the machine feel the need to redo movies? there was nothing to this movie at all. it moved too fast (dare i say) and didn't make much sense motive wise, and was too and then they did this, and then they did this, and then "release the kraken". ralph fiennes was just playing voldemort with hair and a nose. terrible. there was obviously too much penis involved with the reinvisioning because there was no focus on character at all. there was lots of focus on gigantic scorpions and weird bark skinned people and cg effects. the only thing that would surprise me about this "film" is if there was no sequel coming..... yep. i just looked things up and prepare yourselves for a clash of the titans trilogy. the first one wasn't enough of a disintegrating turd in the rain, we need more giant scorpions! we demand more god on demi-god action!!!!! why does everything have to be a trilogy. i want four! give me a quatorze-ology. (that was a bono joke if you aren't hip enough) yes. no. i desire more than macaroni pictures! i desire 14 clash of the titans in 3d! where the only thing differentiating them from a straight to dvd release is the massive amount of money spent on effects. with free taco bell to anyone who pays for a ticket. yessss. the smell of taco bell and 3d grecians. nothing sounds better to me. release the diarrhea!
Swept Away
as part of our 200th post extravaganza moster asked you viewers what you would like us to review. we decided this was horrible enough and neither one of us had seen it. was it meant to be?
Swept Away (2002)
Writer: Guy Ritchie (screenplay), Lina Wertmuller (1974 screenplay)
Director: guess
Starring: the man that used to be madonna or skeletor, if you prefer, and some bearded guy
Synopsis
Seemingly nice super-rich husband (spoiler alert: He's really a total piece of shit.) arranges as a vacation for his wife of atmospheric standards and two friend-couples a cruise from Italy to Greece on a small luxury yacht. During the cruise, the wife is nothing but a cunt to the staff in general and one steward/part-time fisherman (?) in particular. One day, she sleeps late and the others go on a dinghy-trip to an island. So she orders that very same crew member to take her on a smaller boat to meet up. The motor fails and they're stranded in this boat for two days before they see a ship and she wrests the flare gun out of his hands only to shoot a hole in the bottom of the boat. Wait... did I say boat? I meant the kind of enhanced rubber raft which one purchases at the Sports Authority. Anyway, they float their way to a deserted island where he takes the opportunity to treat her like garbage and truly degrade her to the point where she has no choice but to fall in love with him. Eventually they're rescued. Will their love endure the pressures of social difference?
The Woman, who understands that curves make a WOMAN
this was almost indescribably bad. i have never seen the original, but the story was a very classic movie theme that couldn't translate well to contemporary society. there's no reason why a socialite couldn't leave her professor husband. it happens all the time, i'm sure. this is only one reason why this movie didn't make any sense.
i think madonna had watched "overboard" too many times, and somehow convinced her then husband to make this movie so she could do a bad impression of goldie hawn. like we've stated throughout this thing, madonna has passed good shape and gone straight to body-builder manliness. you can't fight father time with muscles, madonna. i think you've caught on to that because now you are even more unrecognizable as yourself and now more closely resemble a poster child for reconstructive surgery barbie. she's 95, but doesn't look a day over freshly molded silicone. going back to the acting, she's too hard looking for an aristo. do they even work out at all? when they were on the dinghy getting lost at sea she was sitting like a street woman with her legs out wide. also, what's with falling in "love" with a guy who calls you his slave and tries to rape you? i kind of feel like the victim of an attempted rape by guy ritchie. ugh. i'm glad it's over and done with. i think this may be a case for a director being forced to give back all money spent on this movie and to any fool who saw it in the theater. restitution.
The MOster, who understands that angles make a man, but who has no self control
From this movie's poster through to its closing credits, the irrefutable logic upon which formed the basis of each key production decision is evident.
Starting in the boardroom, funding this venture would be easy to justify. Guy Ritchie, who in 2002 had only made the same action movie twice, was the perfect auteur for a claustrophobic love story. Madonna, who a mere six years earlier starred in a period piece about a for-the-people stateswoman, was the perfect choice to play a rich bitch with no empathetic personality traits. Expecting his straight male me like things go boom audience to get together with her gay male oh how sweet audience and watch this movie was no different than expecting yellow and green to get together and make purple.
This level of perfection in decision making extends right on through to the characters. Beginning with the guests on the yacht, it makes utter sense that the three couples--the aforementioned seemingly nice person and super-shrew; an obviously gay man and his relatively harmless beard; and an undefined hound and his vagina transportation device--would best couple-friends and would want to spend however many days with nobody else for company. Similarly, when chartering your yacht to such a wealthy and discerning man
as the husband of the shrew, it seems only natural to crew such a vessel by standing in a blindfold at the end of the dock where your friends work, spinning around three times, and throwing a bunch of darts. A fisherman for a chief steward? Why not? A couple of guys to sit around the kitchen and make jokes, occasionally steering small boats? Sold!
When circumstances come together in such a way as to force Veruca and MC Skat Kat into one of these small boats, we again face a situation where the course of action presented is the most sensible one for all involved. Of course this boat wouldn't have a radio or a navigation device! If it did, how could these people think that they had truly gotten away from it all? Of course there would be no life jackets! If you had to wear a life jacket, how could you tease the man you hate with your ribcage? Of course the boat is plastic! Did you expect the captain to maybe go to the next yacht supply store down the pier when stocking this cruise?
Keeping all this in mind, it's actually a little hard to comprehend why the fisherman would be so ill-inclined to cowtow to the shrew, but only for a little while; his mastery of fabrication is evident. He used his fingers to turn seaweed into a 20x20 fishing net. He used his hands to turn twigs into multiple fishing. He used his wits to turn driftwood into a shanty (replete with bed-shelf). It's therefore unfair to question when he uses his raw power to turn brutal degradation and a situation literally one thrust away from rape into true love. When she's made her way back to him after being left, weeping, in the sand she opens the shanty door to find his warm arms waiting for her embrace and they spend the next few weeks in romantic bliss. This bliss is so great that again we can't question the logic behind her hiding from him the presence of a rescue ship and certain medical aid.
I just realized that I've written four paragraphs and haven't discussed the direction. I think that's because I don't want to tarnish such a glowing report as this with negativity.
Anyway, given the wealth of our reformed brat, it should come as no surprise that numerous rescue attempts are made and eventually she has to tell him that she's just so dedicated to him and only him that she doesn't want to leave the place of her bittersweet turning out. He does, though. He says it's because he wants to test his filly-breaking skills, but there's so much pain in the reading of that line that he might have an ulterior motive such as a desire to sleep under a roof which doesn't leak. Or he might have detached his testicles.
Since the real world is a direct opposite of their island paradise, there is again no surprise when their personalities tragically shift from aggression to passivity. But even passive people will long, and longing will prevail. So while she sits weeping like the dog he so quickly sold he realizes that he shouldn't have put her in the pound after all and goes to buy her a collar. We sigh with our empathy for a situation in which we've all found ourselves, at one time or another. And we are relieved when his passive proposal of marriage is thwarted by the husband whose doting was such a problem on the yacht. The final shot of a very expensive ring falling gently to the ocean floor flips the mirror back to the correct orientation and we see that all is right with the world. Rich for rich and poor for poor
Swept Away (2002)
Writer: Guy Ritchie (screenplay), Lina Wertmuller (1974 screenplay)
Director: guess
Starring: the man that used to be madonna or skeletor, if you prefer, and some bearded guy
Synopsis
Seemingly nice super-rich husband (spoiler alert: He's really a total piece of shit.) arranges as a vacation for his wife of atmospheric standards and two friend-couples a cruise from Italy to Greece on a small luxury yacht. During the cruise, the wife is nothing but a cunt to the staff in general and one steward/part-time fisherman (?) in particular. One day, she sleeps late and the others go on a dinghy-trip to an island. So she orders that very same crew member to take her on a smaller boat to meet up. The motor fails and they're stranded in this boat for two days before they see a ship and she wrests the flare gun out of his hands only to shoot a hole in the bottom of the boat. Wait... did I say boat? I meant the kind of enhanced rubber raft which one purchases at the Sports Authority. Anyway, they float their way to a deserted island where he takes the opportunity to treat her like garbage and truly degrade her to the point where she has no choice but to fall in love with him. Eventually they're rescued. Will their love endure the pressures of social difference?
The Woman, who understands that curves make a WOMAN
this was almost indescribably bad. i have never seen the original, but the story was a very classic movie theme that couldn't translate well to contemporary society. there's no reason why a socialite couldn't leave her professor husband. it happens all the time, i'm sure. this is only one reason why this movie didn't make any sense.
i think madonna had watched "overboard" too many times, and somehow convinced her then husband to make this movie so she could do a bad impression of goldie hawn. like we've stated throughout this thing, madonna has passed good shape and gone straight to body-builder manliness. you can't fight father time with muscles, madonna. i think you've caught on to that because now you are even more unrecognizable as yourself and now more closely resemble a poster child for reconstructive surgery barbie. she's 95, but doesn't look a day over freshly molded silicone. going back to the acting, she's too hard looking for an aristo. do they even work out at all? when they were on the dinghy getting lost at sea she was sitting like a street woman with her legs out wide. also, what's with falling in "love" with a guy who calls you his slave and tries to rape you? i kind of feel like the victim of an attempted rape by guy ritchie. ugh. i'm glad it's over and done with. i think this may be a case for a director being forced to give back all money spent on this movie and to any fool who saw it in the theater. restitution.
The MOster, who understands that angles make a man, but who has no self control
From this movie's poster through to its closing credits, the irrefutable logic upon which formed the basis of each key production decision is evident.
Starting in the boardroom, funding this venture would be easy to justify. Guy Ritchie, who in 2002 had only made the same action movie twice, was the perfect auteur for a claustrophobic love story. Madonna, who a mere six years earlier starred in a period piece about a for-the-people stateswoman, was the perfect choice to play a rich bitch with no empathetic personality traits. Expecting his straight male me like things go boom audience to get together with her gay male oh how sweet audience and watch this movie was no different than expecting yellow and green to get together and make purple.
This level of perfection in decision making extends right on through to the characters. Beginning with the guests on the yacht, it makes utter sense that the three couples--the aforementioned seemingly nice person and super-shrew; an obviously gay man and his relatively harmless beard; and an undefined hound and his vagina transportation device--would best couple-friends and would want to spend however many days with nobody else for company. Similarly, when chartering your yacht to such a wealthy and discerning man
as the husband of the shrew, it seems only natural to crew such a vessel by standing in a blindfold at the end of the dock where your friends work, spinning around three times, and throwing a bunch of darts. A fisherman for a chief steward? Why not? A couple of guys to sit around the kitchen and make jokes, occasionally steering small boats? Sold!
When circumstances come together in such a way as to force Veruca and MC Skat Kat into one of these small boats, we again face a situation where the course of action presented is the most sensible one for all involved. Of course this boat wouldn't have a radio or a navigation device! If it did, how could these people think that they had truly gotten away from it all? Of course there would be no life jackets! If you had to wear a life jacket, how could you tease the man you hate with your ribcage? Of course the boat is plastic! Did you expect the captain to maybe go to the next yacht supply store down the pier when stocking this cruise?
Keeping all this in mind, it's actually a little hard to comprehend why the fisherman would be so ill-inclined to cowtow to the shrew, but only for a little while; his mastery of fabrication is evident. He used his fingers to turn seaweed into a 20x20 fishing net. He used his hands to turn twigs into multiple fishing. He used his wits to turn driftwood into a shanty (replete with bed-shelf). It's therefore unfair to question when he uses his raw power to turn brutal degradation and a situation literally one thrust away from rape into true love. When she's made her way back to him after being left, weeping, in the sand she opens the shanty door to find his warm arms waiting for her embrace and they spend the next few weeks in romantic bliss. This bliss is so great that again we can't question the logic behind her hiding from him the presence of a rescue ship and certain medical aid.
I just realized that I've written four paragraphs and haven't discussed the direction. I think that's because I don't want to tarnish such a glowing report as this with negativity.
Anyway, given the wealth of our reformed brat, it should come as no surprise that numerous rescue attempts are made and eventually she has to tell him that she's just so dedicated to him and only him that she doesn't want to leave the place of her bittersweet turning out. He does, though. He says it's because he wants to test his filly-breaking skills, but there's so much pain in the reading of that line that he might have an ulterior motive such as a desire to sleep under a roof which doesn't leak. Or he might have detached his testicles.
Since the real world is a direct opposite of their island paradise, there is again no surprise when their personalities tragically shift from aggression to passivity. But even passive people will long, and longing will prevail. So while she sits weeping like the dog he so quickly sold he realizes that he shouldn't have put her in the pound after all and goes to buy her a collar. We sigh with our empathy for a situation in which we've all found ourselves, at one time or another. And we are relieved when his passive proposal of marriage is thwarted by the husband whose doting was such a problem on the yacht. The final shot of a very expensive ring falling gently to the ocean floor flips the mirror back to the correct orientation and we see that all is right with the world. Rich for rich and poor for poor
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)